Why Is Risk Aversion Essentially Important for Endogenous Economic Growth?
The familiar condition for a balanced growth path indicates that a household’s attitude toward risk plays a significantly important role for endogenous economic growth, but the mechanism behind this importance has not been sufficiently examined. In this paper, I show that in the process of endogenous growth, the decreasing rate of marginal utility is kept constant and the household’s quickness of response to new technologies determines the growth rate. Quickness of response to new technology and degree of risk aversion are quite similar. Given a constant decreasing rate of marginal utility, if on average households in a country are more cautious and respond less quickly to new technologies, firms in that country will invest less in new technologies. As a result, the endogenous economic growth rate of the country will be lower than that of others. If people respond more quickly, the growth rate will be higher.
Harashima, T. (2020). Why is Risk Aversion Essentially Important for Endogenous Economic Growth? Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Volume XV, Fall, 3(69), 556-569. https://doi.org/10.57017/jaes.v15.3(69).05
[1] Aghion, Ph., and Howitt, P. 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2): 323-351. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3223
[2] Aghion, Ph., and Howitt, P. 1997. Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. ISBN: 978-0262528467, 710 p.
[3] Becker, R.A. 1980. On the long-run steady state in a simple dynamic model of equilibrium with heterogeneous households. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95(2): 375–382. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885506
[4] Burton, E.L. 2015. The impact of risk aversion on economic development in Portugal. Perspectives on Business and Economics, Volume 33. https://preserve.lehigh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003& context=perspectives-v33
[5] Dinopoulos, E., and Thompson, P. 1998. Schumpeterian growth without scale effects. Journal of Economic Growth, 3(4): 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009711822294
[6] Eicher, T.S., and Turnovsky, S.J. 1999. Non-Scale models of economic growth. The Economic Journal, 109(457): 394–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00454
[7] Ellison, M., and Pearlman, J. 2011. Saddle path Learning. Journal of Economic Theory, 146(4): 1500–1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2011.03.005
[8] Evans, G.W., and Honkapohja, S. 2001. Learning and Expectations in Macroeconomics, Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691049212, 424 p.
[9] García-Peñalosa, C., and Wen, J.F. 2008. Redistribution and entrepreneurship with Schumpeterian growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 13(1): 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-008-9027-5
[10] Ghiglino, Ch. and Tabasso, N. 2016. Risk aversion in a model of endogenous growth, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 64: 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.03.002
[11] Grossman, G.M., and Helpman, E. 1991. Innovation and growth in the global economy, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. ISBN: 0262570971, 9780262570978, 359 p.
[12] Harashima, T. 2010. Sustainable heterogeneity: Inequality, growth, and social welfare in a heterogeneous population, MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 24233.
[13] Harashima, T. 2012. Sustainable heterogeneity as the unique socially optimal allocation for almost all social welfare functions, MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 40938.
[14] Harashima, T. 2013. An asymptotically non-scale endogenous growth model, MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 44393.
[15] Harashima, T. 2017. Sustainable heterogeneity: Inequality, growth, and social welfare in a heterogeneous population, in Japanese. Journal of Kanazawa Seiryo University, 51 (1): 31–80.
[16] Harashima, T. 2018. Do households actually generate rational expectations? “Invisible hand” for steady state,” MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 88822.
[17] Harashima, T. 2019a. Do households actually generate rational expectations? “Invisible hand” for steady state,” in Japanese, Journal of Kanazawa Seiryo University, 52 (2): 49–70.
[18] Harashima, T. 2019b. An asymptotically non-scale endogenous growth model, Journal of Kanazawa Seiryo University, 52 (2): 71–86, in Japanese.
[19] Jones, C.I. 1995. R&D-based models of economic growth, Journal of Political Economy, 103: 759–784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/262002
[20] Jones, C.I. 1999. Growth: With or without scale effects? American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 89(2): 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.2.139
[21] Kortum, S.S. 1997. Research, patenting, and technological change. Econometrica, 65: 1389–1419. https://doi.org/0012-9682(199711)65:6<1389:RPATC>2.0.CO;2-V
[22] Lucas, R.E. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22: 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
[23] Lucas, R.E. Jr. 1972. Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of Economic Theory, 4 (2): 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90142-1
[24] Marcet, A., and Sargent, T.J. 1989. Convergence of least squares learning mechanisms in self-referential linear stochastic models. Journal of Economic Theory, 48(2): 337–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(89)90032-X
[25] Muth, J.F. 1961. Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica, 29(3): 315–335. https://doi.org/0012-9682(196107)29:3<315:REATTO>2.0.CO;2-G
[26] Peretto, P. 1998. Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3: 283–311. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009799405456
[27] Peretto, P., and Smulders, S. 2002. Technological distance, growth and scale effects. The Economic Journal, 112: 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00732
[28] Romer, P.M. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94: 1002–1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420
[29] Romer, P.M. 1987. Growth based on increasing returns due to specialization. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 77: 56–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/1805429
[30] Romer, P.M. 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98: 71–102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
[31] Sargent, T.J., Fand, D. and Goldfeld, S. 1973. Rational expectations, the real rate of interest, and the natural rate of unemployment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2: 429–480.
[32] Segerstrom, P. 1998. Endogenous growth without scale effects. American Economic Review, 88: 1290–1310. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322157241
[33] Young, A. 1998. Growth without scale effects. Journal of Political Economy, 106: 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1086/250002
[34] Zeira, J. 2011. Innovations, patent races and endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 16(2): 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-011-9066-1